Year: 2023

  • Cupertino Considers Increasing Sales Tax Rate

    Cupertino Considers Increasing Sales Tax Rate

    On December 5, 2023, City Council voted to explore raising Cupertino sales taxes by 0.25% (to a total of 9.375%). The decision follows staff recommendations, and would poll the business community to understand whether they would be willing to vote for a 0.25% tax hike on the November 2024 ballot.

    Background

    Presently, Cupertino receives approximately $0.65 for every $100 of products purchased from Apple online in California. However, the State recently decided to rescind Apple’s practice of directing online sales tax revenue to Cupertino. 

    The City has contemplated the loss of its lucrative Apple deal since at least 2006. The annual budget cautioned:

    ‘Our largest sales tax producer, Apple computer, comprises 26% and given the volatility of the high tech industry, this fact alone has put this revenue source in an “at risk” situation. To add to this concern, the State is continuing its efforts to change the way Internet sales are reported and, if they are successful, will dramatically affect the amount of sales tax revenue currently received from Apple.’

    When online sales surged during the height of COVID-19, so did Cupertino’s net sales tax income, which peaked at $42.6M in fiscal year 2020/21. The average sales tax income was $23.3M in the fiscal years 2015/16 through 2018/19. If the State nullifies Apple’s agreement with the City, sales tax income is estimated to plunge from $11.4M to $9M in 2023. While the City appeals this decision, it is finally preparing for the worst-case scenario. 

    Muddy Messaging

    In May 2023, the City anticipated a $31M or 73% decline in sales-tax revenue. Recently, the budget gap was reduced to a more realistic $15M. However, with the exception of some smaller cuts, such as cancelling 4th of July fireworks next year, the City has not significantly curbed spending since receiving its first warning letter from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) in December 2021. To the contrary, the current annual budget has increased to $113M, from an actual spending of $89M in 2018/19. 

    Accordingly, subsequent budgets listed various “budget-balancing” strategies, among them, taxes on sales (Transaction and Use Tax), hotel stays (Transient Occupancy Tax), parcels, and businesses (Business Operations Tax).

    City Staff Pushes for Sales Tax Increase

    At the December 5, City Council Study Session, staff asked Council to provide “direction to staff regarding exploring the feasibility of one or more potential revenue tax measures – Transaction and Use Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax, Parcel Tax, and/or Business Operations Tax-through opinion research for the November 2024 election.” City Staff and Urban Futures Inc (UFI) presented these four options, but the Transaction and Use Tax was the pre-determined winner: as of October 2023, the City had already entered into a $170K contract with TeamCivX for sales tax revenue measure polling and consulting services.

    The following list describes the new tax proposals and compares them with information from the 2020/21 Budget.

    1. Transaction and Use Tax (TUT): A new 0.25% Transaction and Use Tax would increase the Cupertino sales tax rate from 9.125% to 9.375%, meaning that a purchase of $100 in taxable goods would cost $0.25 more. This tax is estimated to raise $5.4M, a significant increase from the 2020/21 Budget estimate of $3M to $4M. This tax would be levied on taxable purchases made in and/or delivered to Cupertino and would not be shared with County tax pools. Only three of Santa Clara County’s fifteen cities have a tax rate this high, Campbell, Milpitas, and San Jose. Some Bay Area cities have higher rates.
    2. Hotel Tax: The City’s Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of 12%, imposed on Hotel stays and Airbnbs, could be increased to 15% (for an estimated $1.875M in revenue). A hotel representative balked at the proposal, leaving Council Members mystified as to why neither the Chamber of Commerce nor Cupertino hotels had been consulted. The 2020/21 Budget did not consider a tax this high and estimated that an increase from 12% to 14% would raise an additional $1.7M.
    3. Parcel Tax: A parcel tax would add $250 to each parcel in the City, regardless of whether it is a small single-family home or an immense industrial complex. A flat tax was considered more straight forward than the more equitable graduated rates of $27 to $613. The graduated rates seem to have been selected so that the amount of money raised for the City would be about the same, $3.7M.
    4. Business Operations Tax: A revised Business License Tax would raise $4.3M, less than half of the $10M estimate in the 2020/21 Budget. No details were provided on how the tax would be calculated. The staff report confirmed that Cupertino has a “notably low business license tax rate compared to neighboring cities on a per capita basis” and warned that a tax-increase could deter existing and future businesses.

    Next Steps

    In January and February, the City will poll the business community for its opinions on a higher sales tax. Outside of the limited poll, it is unclear what communications the public will receive around a potential sales tax ballot measure. A majority vote on the November 2024 ballot would be needed to enact a new 0.25% sales tax. 

    City staff will also discuss budget cuts. Just after the December council meeting, City Staff contracted with Voler Strategic Advisors (VSA) for $42K to “Develop a media strategy on key issues such as the budget or major developments.” As such, the public can potentially expect to receive professional messaging around the budget cuts.

  • Are Cupertino’s Single Family Homes At Risk of Becoming Apartments?

    Are Cupertino’s Single Family Homes At Risk of Becoming Apartments?

    As in many other cities across California, Cupertino is trying to complete its Housing Element (HE), a document that describes how the city will meet its housing obligation for the period 2023-2031.  Cupertino is required to supply a minimum of 4,588 housing units, with 41% of these units being low to very low income (affordable) plus extra just in case some sites do not develop as expected.

    This long process involves identifying the properties, developing “Goals, Policies and Strategies” to guide the City in all its development then re-zoning the properties to match the densities and goals, policies and strategies selected.  All this has to be approved by the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD).

    On November 30, 2023 Cupertino submitted its “Second Draft” (3rd submittal) of its Housing Element (HE) to HCD for approval.  There has been no public discussion of goals, policies and strategies at any Housing Commission, Planning Commission or City Council meeting where people would have the opportunity to ask questions, discuss or provide input.

    We encourage the public to read the Housing Element Goals, Policies and Strategies section because it specifies what development will be allowed in various neighborhoods.

    Strategies to Turn Cupertino Home Sites into Apartment Buildings

    Two strategies that impact homes across Cupertino are buried within two bulleted items under HE-1.3.6:

    • “Allowing corner lots in R1 zoning districts to develop as multi-family rental housing using R3 zoning regulations to encourage missing middle developments.” This means that every Single-Family Home located on a corner lot can turn into an apartment.
    • “Allowing lots zoned for single family residential uses that abut (either shares a property line or is directly across the street from) property that fronts an arterial or major collector, and is zoned and used for commercial or mixed-use development, to develop with multi-family housing using R3 zoning regulations to encourage missing middle housing.” This means that every Single-Family Home located behind or around a shopping center on specific roads can turn into an apartment building.  Note that “arterials” are Homestead Rd, Stevens Creek Blvd, De Anza Blvd, Wolfe Rd and “major collectors” are N. Tantau, Miller Ave, N. Stelling, Bubb Rd, N. Foothill Expressway.

    These two strategies not only impact the homes specified but their neighbors, the look and feel of their neighborhoods and create uncertainty for current and prospective homeowners. Furthermore, if a developer uses Density Bonus, the height, setback and parking requirements can and will be removed (waived) without the ability to stop it. 

    Next Steps

    The City has identified and is prepared to rezone far more Housing Element sites than is required to meet its obligation to the State. The additional sites identified (buffer) do not include the ADU units expected to be built across the city during this same 8-year cycle.  These future ADUs will generate even more housing units without the need for these two strategies.

    If these strategies are included in this 8-year cycle, what will the city give away next time? Sometime in January-February 2024, there will be a joint session of the Housing and Planning Commissions to discuss the HE Goals, Policies and Strategies followed by a City Council meeting sometime in April to approve the final Housing Element document.

    Is your home impacted? Here is a list of streets potentially subject to this new change.

    Reach out to your representatives now to provide your input.  The City Council has the final say.  Here is their contact information:

    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Individual City Council member emails can be found here.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

    Single Family Homes – on corner lots that may be impacted

    The current Cupertino Zoning Map shows R1 (single family homes) in CREAM COLOR.  Any R1-x home on a corner lot all across Cupertino can be redeveloped as an apartment (R3) and can invoke the Density Bonus Law to remove the height, setback and parking restrictions.

    Source: cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/13535/637279090319370000

    Single Family Homes sharing a property line with a commercial or multi-use property on any of the roads below can be redeveloped as an apartment (R3) and can invoke the Density Bonus Law to remove the height, setback and parking restrictions.

    NOTE:  Arterials and collectors are specific roads.

    • Arterials are Homestead Rd, Stevens Creek Blvd, De Anza Blvd, Wolfe Rd
    • Major collectors are N. Tantau, Miller Ave, N. Stelling, Bubb Rd, N. Foothill Expressway

    Homes on these streets can be impacted.  This list may not be complete:

    • Near Homestead
      • Shady Oak Ln
      • Firethorn Dr
      • Northpoint area-(possibly)
    • Near Stevens Creek Blvd
      • Norwich Ave-all of east side
      • Amherst Dr-east end
      • Denison Ave-south end
      • Wheaton Dr-all of south side
      • Stern Ave-north end
      • Bret Ave-north end
      • Judy Ave-north end
      • S Tantau Ave-north end
      • E. Estates Dr-north end
      • Richwood Dr-north end
      • Bixby Dr-all of north side
      • Brenda Ct-north and east end
      • Mello Place-north end
      • Deeprose Pl-north end (possibly)
      • Randy Lane-south end close to Stevens Creek Blvd
      • Miner Place-north end, south end
      • Partlett Place-north end, south end and by Donut Wheel
      • Scofield Dr – all of it
      • Alves Dr-between Sachi Way and Stelling
      • Peninsula Ave-south end
      • Santa Clara Ave-south end
      • Adrian Ave-south end
      • Eaton Place-east end
      • Ramona Ct-north end
      • Northeast side of Stevens Creek Blvd near N. Foothill Expressway
      • Cupertino Rd-west end
    • De Anza Blvd
      • Sunrise Dr-east end (possibly)
      • Rodrigues Ave-behind XLB Kitchen shopping center
      • Terry Way-east side
      • Paradise Dr-east side
      • McClellan Rd-northeast and southeast end
      • Felton Way-east side
      • Blossom Ln-east end
      • Kirwin Ln-east end 
      • Westlynn Way- east side (possibly)
      • Jamestown Dr-east side
      • Clifden Way – west end
      • Clay St – west end
      • Silverado Ave – west end
      • Larry Way – west side
      • Virginia Swan Place – north end
    • Wolfe Rd
      • None
    • Miller Ave
      • None
    • N Tantau
      • None
    • Bollinger
      • Clifden Way-west side
      • La Roda Dr-south end
      • S Blaney Ave-southwest end
    • N. Stelling
      • None
    • Bubb Rd
      • None
    • N. Foothill Expressway
      • None

    LINKS:

    Current Cupertino Zoning Map: https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/13535/637279090319370000

    Current Heart of the City Zoning Map

    PDF Page 8 of 32 has the HOC Zoning Map: https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/415/636280426123030000

    Current Cupertino Land Use Map: https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/13148/637045848489430000

    Current Cupertino General Plan, Chapter 5 Mobility, PDF Page 11 of 26 shows Arterials (Boulevards) and Collectors (Avenues): https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/12735/636317560222370000

    2023-2031 Housing Element – Revised November 2023
    PDF Pages 13-63 Goals, Policies, and Strategies:
    https://engagecupertino.org/17233/widgets/53810/documents/49287

    2023-2031 Housing Element Appendices: https://engagecupertino.org/public-documents

  • New Plans Revealed for Former Vallco Site

    New Plans Revealed for Former Vallco Site

    On December 5, 2023, the property owner of the former Vallco shopping mall, which is located at N. Wolfe Rd. and Stevens Creek Blvd., submitted a new development plan to the City of Cupertino. The plan, called “The Rise,” is posted on the City website. The old shopping site is replaced by a mix of housing, offices, shopping areas, and open spaces, similar to previous plans that have been submitted over the last decade.

    “The Rise” Shrinks by 1M Square Feet as Compared with its Previous Application

    When completed, the new project will provide:

    • 4.38M sq. ft. of housing: 2,669 for-rent and for-sale homes. 890 homes are “affordable.” 2,603 parking spaces allocated for the homes and the entire project has approximately 9,570 parking spaces, above- and below-ground and along internal roads.
    • 1.95M sq. ft. of office space: Note that current market demand for office space has plummeted, and the developer recently defaulted on a loan on an office building at 590 E. Middlefield Rd., Mountain View1
    • 226K sq. ft. of retail space: This is less than half of what was previously planned.

    A Revised Design with a New Architect

    The developer recently switched to a different architectural design firm, Kohn Pedersen Fox (KPF). Via the developer’s announcement, “KPF is a world-renowned design firm known for their innovative and community-driven approach to urban design.” The firm has a formidable portfolio, including the headquarters of its major investor, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority2.

    Will Cupertino Agree to the Modification?

    The developer is requesting modifications from its existing application in four key areas:

    • Major development permit
    • Tentative subdivision map
    • Major architecture and site permit
    • Tree removal (714 trees would be removed and 715 trees would be added).

    In spite of the significant changes from the previous plan, the developer claims that this project is a modification of the previous SB35 applications. SB35 is a housing law that allows the developer to streamline residential building applications. If the City agrees that the modifications are minor, then the new buildings can use antiquated building codes from 2016, even if the development is built years from now. This also makes the new buildings less energy-efficient and avoids the City’s 2019 bird-safe development guidelines.

    The press release stated that some buildings had been reduced to 85 feet in response to community input. It is possible that financial considerations also contributed to some of the lower heights. A new State law SB423 requires skilled and trained labor for SB35 projects that exceed 85-feet. Nevertheless, the project still contains housing that is up to 200-feet tall and even higher office space that is up to nearly 230-feet tall.

    Soil Contamination

    The Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) will need clarification from the developer as to whether the clean-up of contaminated soil* dictated by a Site Management Plan (SMP) complies with the new plan. The DEH cautioned that it may rescind approval of the SMP and require additional site assessment, risk evaluations, and mitigation measures.

    Next Steps

    The City has 60 days to respond to the developer as to whether the project is compliant with SB35 or whether it can be considered a modification to a previously-approved SB35 project. Since the developer intends to subdivide the project and build it in phases, it is unknown when it will be completed, if ever.

    References

    1. Avalos, George. “Big Mountain View office building at choice site faces loan default.” The Mercury News, 25 Sep. 2023. https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/09/25/mountain-view-real-estate-office-develop-build-loan-tech-economy-covid/. Accessed December 20, 2023.
    2. Li, Roland. “A dying mall near Apple’s headquarters is turning into a fight over Silicon Valley’s soul.” San Francisco Chronicle, 25 Nov. 2018, https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/A-dying-mall-near-Apple-s-headquarters-is-13417634.php. Accessed December 20, 2023.

    Moulds, Reed. The Rise Reveals New Design, Vision Forward. Sand Hill Property Company, 6 December 2023, https://therisecalifornia.com/news/the-rise-reveals-new-design-vision-forward. Accessed December 19, 2023.

    City of Cupertino. Vallco Town Center SB35 Project. https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/major-projects/vallco/vallco-sb-35-project. Accessed December 19, 2023.

    *Potential contaminants of concern apparently detected in the soil at the N Wolfe Rd/Stevens Creek Blvd location and recorded by the State Water Resources Control Board website include: benzene, diesel, lead, other chlorinated hydrocarbons, other insecticides/pesticides/fumigants/herbicides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE).[12]
    [12] GeoTracker, “Summary” tab. State Water Resources Control Board. 11 November 2022. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T10000017167

  • County Deems Lehigh Permanente Quarry Application Incomplete

    County Deems Lehigh Permanente Quarry Application Incomplete

    On December 7, Santa Clara County’s Planning and Development Office deemed Lehigh’s Reclamation Plan application incomplete. The 31-page letter listed a number of areas that require clarification such as, appropriately defining the land areas to be reclaimed, fish and wildlife protection, water quality concerns, new truck routes, and additional truck traffic.

    What is Reclamation?

    The purpose of the Reclamation Plan is to describe how the mined land will be repaired for a secondary beneficial use, such as open space. Reclamation does not restore land to its pre-mining state. The biggest issue facing residents is that Lehigh intends to convert its Permanente Quarry into a for-profit landfill that would take in 31.2 million cubic yards of off-site clean fill, which translates to an increase in truck traffic. This is a significant change from the approved 2012 Reclamation Plan that would fill the quarry with onsite mining-waste to stabilize the crumbling ridgeline between the quarry and Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve.

    Source: https://stgenpln.blob.core.windows.net/document/PLN19_0106_Permanente_Quarry_PreApplication_Meeting_Packet.pdf

    Lehigh History

    From 1939 through 2020, Lehigh’s Permanente Quarry mined for limestone to feed its onsite cement plant that was fueled by petroleum coke, making the site one of the Bay Area’s biggest air polluters. The site has an egregious record of violations across numerous regulatory agencies.

    In early 2020, Lehigh stopped blasting for limestone and manufacturing cement. Since then, residents have noticed truck traffic from two new businesses there, aggregate processing and cement distribution. In 2021, with the notable exception of the Lehigh Permanente Quarry, HeidelbergCement AG of Germany sold its west coast operations to Martin Marietta of North Carolina for $2.3 billion. In 2022, Cupertino residents were blinded by bright movie lights when Lehigh leased its site for filming a Sci-Fi movie. 

    Next Steps

    Lehigh has 180 days to respond to the issues flagged by County Planning, County Road and Airports, County Geologist,  U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. There were no comments attached to the County’s letter from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. Additionally, the County and Lehigh will schedule a required community meeting prior to deeming the application as complete.

    References

    County of Santa Clara Department of Planning and Development letter to Lehigh regarding Major Reclamation Plan Amendment Application. https://stgenpln.blob.core.windows.net/document/PLN23_100_Letter_Incomplete.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2023.
    https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/martin-marietta-buy-heidelbergcements-western-us-assets-23-bln-2021-05-24/

  • Small Business Spotlight: Horizon Bakery Opens in Cupertino

    Small Business Spotlight: Horizon Bakery Opens in Cupertino

    A new custom cake shop, Horizon Bakery, has opened in Cupertino. This family-owned establishment boasts a wide portfolio of creations, ranging from intricately hand-painted cakes to elaborate floral and figurine toppings.

    Horizon Bakery specifically chose Cupertino as the home for their new shop because they believe they can be successful here. In fact, its owners have poured an immense amount of effort into making the space their new home. They spent one year remodeling the location, demolishing and then rebuilding the entire interior, which was formerly Egghead Sandwiches.

    Today, the shop’s owner works with a small team to create the cakes. They also offer smaller desserts (photos below). Horizon Bakery is located on 19929 Stevens Creek Boulevard. It is open from 12 PM – 7 PM, Tuesday – Sunday. Visit horizonbakery.com to learn more.

  • December 2023 Newsletter: New Plans for Former Vallco Site, Will Cupertino Raise Sales Taxes? — and more

    We thank you for following along this year as we shed light on many critical issues. From changes impacting the face of Cupertino to loss of public resources, we hope to spark dialogue amongst residents who rightfully expect the utmost of their city governance. In this issue:

    • Is Cupertino’s Single-Family Housing at Risk?
    • Will Sales Taxes Go Up in Cupertino?
    • New Plans Revealed for Former Vallco Site
    • County Deems Lehigh Quarry Application “Incomplete”
    • Small Business Spotlight: New Custom Cake Shop Opens in Cupertino

    Are Cupertino’s Single Family Homes At Risk?

    On November 30, 2023 Cupertino submitted its “Second Draft” (3rd submittal) of its Housing Element (HE) to the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) for approval. Residents should be aware of two decisions that will impact homes across Cupertino if approved:

    1. Any Single-Family Home on a corner lot could turn into an apartment.
    2. Any Single-Family Home behind or around a shopping center on specific roads could turn into apartments.

    Example of Cupertino neighborhoods with single-family homes adjacent to retail

    These potential changes create uncertainty for current and prospective homeowners, and could drastically alter our neighborhoods. Cupertino has identified and is prepared to re-zone far more HE sites than is required to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) obligation.

    Reach out to your representatives now to provide input. The Cupertino City Council has the final say. Here is their contact information:

    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Individual City Council member emails can be found here.


    Will Sales Taxes Go Up in Cupertino?

    On December 5, 2023, City Council voted to explore raising Cupertino sales taxes by 0.25% (to a total of 9.375%).

    City Staff Pushes for Sales Tax Increase

    At the December 5, City Council Study Session, staff asked Council for direction on four revenue-raising options. They recommended the Transaction and Use Tax (TUT), but also considered raising the Hotel Tax, Parcel Tax, and Business Operations Tax.

    Next Steps

    In January and February, the City will poll a subset of voters for their opinions on a higher sales tax. A majority vote on the November 2024 ballot is needed to raise sales taxes by 0.25%.


    New Plans Revealed for Former Vallco Site

    On December 5, 2023, the property owner of the former Vallco shopping mall (N. Wolfe Rd. and Stevens Creek Blvd.) submitted a new development plan to the City of Cupertino. The plan, called “The Rise,” replaces the old site with housing, offices, shopping areas, and open spaces, similar to previous plans that have been submitted over the last decade.

    A Revised Design with a New Architect

    The developer recently switched to a different architectural design firm, Kohn Pedersen Fox (KPF). Via the developer’s announcement, “KPF is a world-renowned design firm known for their innovative and community-driven approach to urban design.”

    Will Cupertino Agree to the Modification?

    Despite significant changes from the prior plan, the developer claims that this project is only a modification of its SB35 application. If the City agrees that the modifications are minor, then the new buildings can use outdated 2016 building codes, even if the development is built years from now. This may make the new buildings less energy-efficient and less environmentally friendly.

    Next Steps

    The City has 60 days to respond to the developer as to whether the project is compliant with SB35 or it can be considered a modification to a previously-approved SB35 project. Since the developer intends to subdivide the project and build it in phases, it is unknown when it will be completed, if ever.


    County Deems Lehigh Permanente Quarry Application Incomplete

    On December 7, Santa Clara County’s Planning and Development Office deemed Lehigh’s Reclamation Plan application incomplete. The 31-page letter listed a number of areas that require clarification such as, appropriately defining the land areas to be reclaimed, fish and wildlife protection, water quality concerns, new truck routes, and additional truck traffic.


    Small Business Spotlight: New Cake Shop Opens in Cupertino

    A new custom cake shop, Horizon Bakery, has opened in Cupertino. This family-owned establishment boasts a wide portfolio of creations, ranging from intricately hand-painted cakes to elaborate floral and figurine toppings.

    horizon bakery

    Horizon Bakery’s owners have poured an immense amount of effort into making the space their new home. They spent one year remodeling the location, demolishing and then rebuilding the entire interior.


    Wishing you a very happy holiday and new year,

    The Cupertino Facts Team

  • Cupertino Shops List

    In an effort to support retail in Cupertino, below is a list of Cupertino shops.

    Please note: this list is as of December 2023. Due to the changing nature of businesses, the shops on this list are subject to change. We will remove outdated entries and/or add new listings as often as possible. We are constantly updating this list as businesses may change. We do not earn any income from this list (or from Cupertino Facts as a whole!).

    Know of a retail shop that isn’t on this list? Please feel free to contact us.

    Categories:


    Clothing & Apparel

    California T-Shirt Company
    10201 Imperial Ave
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    TJ Maxx
    20730 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Keating Capezio
    19449 Stevens Blvd, Ste 110
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Target
    20745 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Ross Dress for Less
    20650 Homestead Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Crafts & Party Supplies

    JOANN Fabric and Crafts
    19765 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino , CA 95014

    Michaels
    20640 Homestead Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014-0451

    Party City
    20740 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Store# 810
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Farmers’ Markets / Outdoor Markets

    West Coast Farmers Market
    21275 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Creekside Farmers Market
    10455 Miller Ave
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    De Anza Flea Market
    21250 Stevens Creek Blvd
    De Anza College Parking Lot
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Grocery

    Cupertino Market
    19725 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Heartland
    10051 E Estates Dr
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Oakmont Produce Market
    19944 Homestead Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Marina Food
    10122 Bandley Dr
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Marukai Market
    19750 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95015

    Safeway
    20620 W Homestead Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Super Cupertino
    7335 Bollinger Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Whole Foods Market
    20955 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    99 Ranch Market
    10983 North Wolfe Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014
    and
    10425 S De Anza Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Home/Furniture

    CORT Furniture Outlet
    19885 Stevens Creek Boulevard
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Daiso
    19750 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino CA 95014

    Home Goods
    20730 Stevens Creek Blvd.
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Mattress Firm
    510 Stevens Creek Boulevard
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Jewelry

    Shane Co.
    19900 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Vardy’s Jewelers
    10227 So De Anza Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Golden Gems
    19658 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Shoes

    Footwear etc.
    20690 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Howard’s Shoes For Children
    19449 Stevens Creek Blvd,Ste 100
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Sporting Goods

    Racket Supply
    10570 S De Anza Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Trail Head Cyclery
    20301 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Off the Sheet Pro Shop
    20990 Homestead Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Top Fitness Cupertino
    20610 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014


    Technology

    Apple Park Visitor Center
    10600 North Tantau Avenue
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    AT&T
    19479 Stevens Creek Blvd., Ste 100
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    T-Mobile
    20803 Stevens Creek Blvd., Ste. 105
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Verizon
    20735 Stevens Creek Blvd, Ste E,
    Cupertino, CA, 95014


    Other Retail

    Chung Hsin Chinese Herbs
    10925 N Wolfe Rd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Staples
    20830 Stevens Creek Blvd
    Cupertino, CA 95014

    Ulta Beauty
    20580 Homestead Road
    Cupertino, CA 95014

  • November 2023 Newsletter: July 4th fireworks defunded, Cupertino’s first Builder’s Remedy apartment project, and more

    What’s in this issue:

    • Cupertino Cancels July 4th Fireworks
    • Cupertino Receives First Builder’s Remedy Development Application
    • Will High Capacity Transit Come to Cupertino?
    • Apply for Cupertino Commissions

    Cupertino Cancels July 4th Fireworks

    While many residents were preparing for their Thanksgiving holiday, the Cupertino City Council decided to cut its July 4th fireworks display.

    There was no community input taken in staff’s recommendation to axe the popular fireworks show, enjoyed by thousands of residents for decades. The suggestion to defund the celebrations was hidden as a one-liner within agenda item #11 for the November 21, 2023 City Council meeting.

    Differing opinions

    Councilmember Kitty Moore cast the lone dissenting vote against defunding the fireworks. “I don’t feel this decision has the input from the public,” Moore stated. “It’s being done at a time when the public isn’t here to comment on it, because it’s buried on this agenda.”

    Moore said that funding can be made available to support the fireworks. “We have 14 positions which aren’t filled, at an average of $180,000 per position,” said Moore. “We do have money available if we are looking into the budget, in areas where there has actually been leftover year over year.”

    On the other hand, Mayor Wei voted to get rid of the July 4th fireworks. The reason Wei gave was that there are worse budget cuts planned in January 2024, so it would be “responsible” to start cutting now.

    A Tale of Two Cities

    The reason cited for eliminating the July 4th fireworks was Cupertino’s $15M structural deficit. However, Cupertino’s handling of this deficit has been inconsistent. On November 7th, Council approved cost of living (COLA) raises for both non-unionized and specific unionized employees, ranging from 3-5%, and added two new fully paid holidays. On October 17th, Council voted to pursue a brand new City Hall building, rather than a renovation of existing buildings for a fraction of the cost.

    Meanwhile, the City has chosen to cut community services. Eliminating the fireworks in 2024 yields a one-time savings of $140K. The city also cut its $30K funding to Shakespeare in the Park, and a $10K teen boba event.

    What’s in Store

    Council voted to retain July 4th morning activities at a reduced scale compared to prior years, at a cost of $7K. Councilmember Liang Chao asked for the Parks & Recreation Commission to explore creative ways to celebrate July 4th without fireworks, and to fund future July 4th events.


    Cupertino Receives First Builder’s Remedy Development Application

    Cupertino has been vulnerable to the “Builder’s Remedy” since it missed its January 2023 deadline for an approved Housing Element from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The “Builder’s Remedy” is a State law that allows developers to bypass local zoning laws for projects that offer affordable housing.

    Builder’s Remedy Reaches Cupertino

    Menlo Park developer Acclaim Properties has submitted Cupertino’s first Builder’s Remedy application: a 141 home apartment complex on 1.63 acres, at the corner of Stevens Creek Blvd and N. Blaney Ave. The site is zoned for commercial use, with a maximum height of 45 feet. However, the developer’s application uses the “Builder’s Remedy” to circumvent these rules, raising its height to 70 feet, and leaving no space for commercial businesses. If this project proceeds, the development will force businesses like Vidyarambh Preschool and Daycare Center and Be Natural Music to vacate the site.

    Source: Builder’s Remedy Project Proposals, Cupertino.org

    Mayor Wei appears either unaware of or indifferent to existing height limits. Via the Mercury News, Wei stated that “five-stories on one of the city’s busiest thoroughfares isn’t unusual,” even though there currently are no other buildings of that height nearby. Wei also said that “there will be more in the next eight years.”

    A Loss of Local Control

    This project, like Vallco using the SB 35 law to tear down our mall, or Westport using the Density Bonus law and decreasing the Oaks Shopping Center area, lowers Cupertino’s retail base at a time when the CDTFA audit is expected to reduce our sales tax revenue by $30M annually, plus back payments.

    Cupertino faces difficult fiscal decisions ahead. The lack of local control in retaining retail can have a dire effect on healthy economic planning. Most importantly, these laws will not help lower housing costs. It is unknown how many more “Builder’s Remedy” projects will be proposed while we wait for the City to get an approved Housing Element.


    Is High-Capacity Transit Coming to Cupertino?

    Via the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision website: Santa Clara, San Jose, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, and the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) are conducting a two-year transportation study for the Stevens Creek Boulevard/West San Carlos corridor. Their goal is to create a vision including multi-modal transportation improvements and possible high-capacity transit connecting Diridon Station in San Jose to Santa Clara and the De Anza College/Highway 85 area in Cupertino.

    Share your feedback by filling out the survey on StevensCreekVision.com, or attend upcoming events:

    Community Advisory Group Meeting #2 (In-Person)
    Santa Clara Central Park Library
    2635 Homestead Rd, Santa Clara, CA
    Thursday, December 7, 2023
    5 – 6:30 p.m.

    Apply for Cupertino Commissions

    The City of Cupertino is now recruiting for its commissions. Those interested in getting more involved in City affairs may visit the Commissions Vacancies page to learn about open positions, and the Commissions page for instructions on how to apply.

    Here is a list of vacancies as of 11/28/30:

    • Audit Committee: 3 available seats
    • Housing Commission: 2 available seats
    • Parks & Recreation Commission: 2 available seats
    • Public Safety Commission: 3 available seats
    • Sustainability Commission: 3 available seats
    • Technology, Information, and Communications Commission: 2 available seats
  • Cupertino Cancels July 4th Fireworks

    Cupertino Cancels July 4th Fireworks

    While many residents were preparing for their Thanksgiving holiday, the Cupertino City Council decided to axe its July 4th fireworks display. There was no community input taken to inform the City staff recommendation to eliminate the popular fireworks show enjoyed by thousands of residents for decades. The suggestion to eliminate the celebrations was also relatively hidden from the public, as a one-liner within agenda item #11 for the November 21, 2023 City Council meeting, “Accept the City Manager’s First Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2023-24.” 

    Differing opinions

    Councilmember Kitty Moore cast the lone dissenting vote against defunding July 4th fireworks. “I don’t feel this decision has the input from the public,” Moore said during the meeting. “I think this is being rushed. It’s being done at a time when the public isn’t here to comment on it, because it’s buried on this agenda.”

    Moore also stated that funding can be made available to support the annual fireworks. “We have 14 positions which aren’t filled, at an average of $180,000 per position,” said Moore. “We do have money available if we are looking into the budget, in areas where there has actually been leftover year over year.”

    On the other hand, Mayor Wei voted to get rid of the July 4th fireworks. The reason Wei gave was that there are worse budget cuts planned in January 2024, so it would be “responsible” to start cutting now. To note: the January service reductions referred to by staff and Council have not deterred the City from approving millions in new expenditures during its most recent October and November 2023 Council meetings. 

    A Tale of Two Cities

    The reason cited for eliminating the July 4th fireworks was Cupertino’s $15M structural deficit. However, Cupertino’s handling of this deficit has been inconsistent. The largest component of the City’s expenses is employee compensation and benefits (via the May 2023 budget presentation). But Cupertino has not had any meaningful reductions in force since its budget deficit was announced. In fact, on November 7th, Council approved cost of living (COLA) raises for both non-unionized and specific unionized employees, ranging from 3-5% and added two new fully paid holidays.

    Impending January budget cuts have not deterred the council majority from approving millions in new expenditures during its most recent October and November 2023 Council meetings. On October 17th, Council voted to partner with developers to build a brand new City Hall building, rather than pursue a renovation of existing buildings for a fraction of the cost. This included a consultant contract of up to $170K1.

    Looking to the Future

    Meanwhile, the City has chosen to cut community services. Eliminating the fireworks in 2024 would provide a one-time savings of $140K. To note, fireworks themselves only cost $45k, but $95k more (breakdown undisclosed) covers staff overtime, sheriff time, and liability insurance. Last year, staff was already proposing cutting fireworks along with the $30K Shakespeare in the Park performances. Neither will be funded for 2024.

    Council voted to retain July 4 morning activities at a reduced scale as compared with prior years at a cost of $7000. Councilmember Liang Chao asked for the Parks & Recreation Commission to explore creative ways to hold July 4th celebrations without fireworks, and to fund future July 4th events. The City has cut July 4th fireworks in the past, so it is possible that they may be restored in future years.

    Footnotes

    1. Master Agreement #2023-031, City of Cupertino, available in the October 17, 2023 Written Communications on Page 7: https://cupertino.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=E2&ID=1053225&GUID=32C570ED-67B8-43BB-8BE8-7F0A82467799
  • Cupertino Receives First Builder’s Remedy Project Application

    Cupertino Receives First Builder’s Remedy Project Application

    Cupertino has been vulnerable to the “Builder’s Remedy” since it missed its January 2023 deadline for an approved Housing Element from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).  The “Builder’s Remedy” is a State law that allows developers to bypass local zoning laws for projects that offer affordable housing.

    Menlo Park developer Acclaim Properties has submitted plans for a 70-foot-tall, 141 home, apartment complex on 1.63 acres, at the corner of Stevens Creek Blvd and N. Blaney Avenue.1 If the project proceeds, the development will force businesses like Vidyarambh Preschool and Daycare Center and Be Natural Music to vacate the site. The new complex would loom over adjacent single-family homes. 

    The site is zoned for commercial use with a maximum height of 45 feet. However, the developer’s application uses the “Builder’s Remedy” to circumvent these zoning rules, raising its building height to 70 feet and not providing space for commercial businesses that bring in sales-tax revenue. The “Builder’s Remedy” is further explained in the article in Cal Matters, “‘Godzilla next door’: How California developers gained new leverage to build more homes.”2 Below are our City’s specific requirements for this area.3 

    Heart of the City Specific Plan Central Stevens Creek Boulevard
    – Primary Use: Commercial/Commercial Office
    – Secondary Use: Office above ground level
    – Supporting Use: Residential/Residential Mixed Uses

    (SOURCE – https://cupertino.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=18&clip_id=1251&meta_id=67811)

    Mayor Wei appears either unaware of or indifferent to existing height limits. Via the Mercury News, Wei stated that “five-stories on one of the city’s busiest thoroughfares isn’t unusual,” even though there currently are no other buildings of that height nearby. Wei also said that “there will be more in the next eight years.”4

    Lack of Visibility into Cupertino Housing Element

    Cupertino’s Housing Element was due on January 31, 2023. Updates, public participation, and oversight have been curtailed since the new City Council took over in 2023. Sadly, the Housing Commission (which met only 4 times this year) and Planning Commission (which met only 6 times this year) were denied the opportunity to provide any input on policies and procedures in this Housing Element. By comparison, these commissions met three times as often in 2022.

    A Need for Increased & Diversified Revenue

    Cupertino must diversify its income sources due to an anticipated 73% decline in sales tax income (from the State’s expected termination of a lucrative sales tax sharing agreement with Apple).5 While it is nearly impossible to recoup this revenue loss, the City can grow sales tax revenue by increasing retail. One percent of sales tax ($1 out of every $100 spent on taxable goods) purchased in Cupertino goes straight back to the City. 

    This project, like Vallco using the SB 35 law to tear down our mall, or Westport using the Density Bonus law and decreasing the Oaks Shopping Center area, lowers Cupertino’s retail base at a time when the CDTFA audit is expected to reduce our sales tax revenue by $30M annually, plus back payments.

    Cupertino has already allowed commercial properties to be rezoned for residential. One example is the new development on Stevens Creek and Foothill (22690 Stevens Creek Blvd). Others are identified in the Housing Element. On the other end, one planned project where Marina Foods is currently located (10145 N De Anza Blvd) retains nearly all of its retail space, while adding 206 condominiums.

    Real estate taxes are another large source of income for Cupertino. But because commercial property owners often use legal loopholes to transfer property ownership without triggering property tax reassessment, taxes on apartment developments will likely not rise through reassessment during anyone’s lifetime. Projects with all-retail or ground-level retail with for-sale housing would raise more sales- and real-estate taxes than the proposed project.

    Our city faces difficult fiscal decisions ahead. But the lack of local control to be able to retain retail is having a dire effect with regards to healthy economic planning. Most importantly, these laws will not help lower housing costs. It is unknown many more “Builder’s Remedy” projects will be proposed while we wait for Cupertino to get an approved Housing Element.

    References:

    Photo credit: City of Cupertino Builder’s Remedy Project Proposals, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/major-projects/builder-s-remedy-project-proposals, Accessed 11/28/2023.

    1. Builder’s Remedy Project Proposals, City of Cupertino, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/major-projects/builder-s-remedy-project-proposals, Accessed 11/28/2023.

    2. Christopher, Ben. (2023, June 5). “Godzilla next door”: How California developers gained new leverage to build more homes. CalMatters. https://calmatters.org/housing/2023/06/california-builders-remedy/, Accessed 11/28/2023.

    3. Redlined Text Changes to the Heart of the City Specific Plan (see Central Stevens Creek Boulevard), City of Cupertino, https://cupertino.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=18&clip_id=1251&meta_id=67811)

    4. Hase, Grace. (2023, November 28). Cupertino sees its first “builder’s remedy” project. The Mercury News. https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/11/27/cupertino-sees-its-first-builders-remedy-project/, Accessed 11/28/2023.

    5. FAQ, City of Cupertino. https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/advanced-components/faq/-seldept-6?NavID=412#:~:text=The%20reduction%20in%20sales%20tax,to%20provide%20a%20soft%20landing. Accessed 11/29/2023.